The alphanumeric string denotes a specific period in the history of a prominent miniatures wargaming company. It represents a catalogue number or possibly a year range, indicative of products or publications released during that timeframe. As an example, items bearing this identifier would have been available for purchase or reference within the associated business context.
Understanding this numerical sequence offers key insights into the evolution of the company’s product line and strategic direction. Its historical significance lies in providing a tangible marker for collectors and enthusiasts, allowing for the identification and categorization of items from a particular era. This, in turn, informs market valuation and facilitates detailed research into the company’s past.
The context provided by this temporal marker leads to exploration of core topics such as the specific miniatures produced, the rule sets in use, and the overall aesthetic trends prevalent during that period. Further investigation reveals details about design philosophies, manufacturing processes, and marketing strategies employed at the time.
1. Catalogue era
The “Catalogue era,” when considered in conjunction with the identifier “games workshop 89-79,” provides a framework for understanding the product offerings and strategic positioning of the company during a specific timeframe. This era represents more than just a period; it encapsulates a distinct phase in the evolution of the Games Workshop brand.
-
Product Line Standardization
The catalogue era dictated the standardized presentation of available products. Listings often included photographs, descriptions, and pricing, facilitating direct mail ordering and retail sales. In the context of “games workshop 89-79,” this standardization allows for a systematic comparison of product ranges across different periods, revealing shifts in design and marketing focus.
-
Marketing and Promotional Strategies
Catalogues served as a primary marketing tool, showcasing new releases, special offers, and painting guides. The content and layout of the catalogue reflected the target audience and the prevailing marketing trends. Examining these elements within the “games workshop 89-79” timeframe provides insights into the company’s efforts to cultivate a specific customer base and promote its intellectual properties.
-
Availability and Distribution Networks
The catalogue era indicates the reach of the company’s distribution network. Catalogues were distributed through mail order, retail stores, and hobby conventions. Studying the catalogue’s circulation and availability during “games workshop 89-79” reveals information about the company’s geographic expansion and its relationship with independent retailers.
-
Intellectual Property Development
Catalogues introduced new characters, settings, and narratives, expanding the company’s intellectual property (IP). The content of the catalogue reflected the ongoing development of established IPs such as Warhammer and Warhammer 40,000. Reviewing catalogue content from “games workshop 89-79” offers insights into the origins and evolution of core themes and characters.
In summary, analyzing the “Catalogue era” through the lens of “games workshop 89-79” reveals critical details regarding product standardization, marketing strategies, distribution networks, and intellectual property development. These facets are interconnected, providing a comprehensive view of the company’s operations during a specific period and its broader impact on the miniatures wargaming hobby.
2. Production timeframe
The “Production timeframe,” as it relates to “games workshop 89-79,” is a critical component in understanding the specific characteristics of items released under that identifier. It directly influences factors such as material composition, manufacturing techniques, and overall product quality. For example, a miniature produced within this timeframe would reflect the prevailing casting technologies and material availability of the era. Differences in these factors, compared to products manufactured before or after this period, can be significant, impacting durability, detail sharpness, and even paint adhesion. The production timeframe establishes the physical and technological limitations within which the company operated, thereby shaping the final product received by consumers.
Consider the composition of plastics used in miniatures during “games workshop 89-79” versus later periods. Early plastics might have been more prone to degradation or exhibit less intricate detail compared to subsequent formulations. Similarly, metal miniatures from this timeframe may utilize alloys and casting processes different from those employed later, leading to variations in weight, finish, and susceptibility to corrosion. Understanding the production timeframe allows collectors and hobbyists to anticipate and account for these differences when handling, painting, and preserving these items. Further, it provides a basis for evaluating the originality and authenticity of collectable items.
In summary, the “Production timeframe” as defined by “games workshop 89-79” is intrinsically linked to the physical properties and manufacturing processes inherent in the company’s product output. This understanding informs the accurate identification, preservation, and assessment of historical miniatures and related merchandise. Recognizing the production timeframe allows for a more nuanced appreciation of the challenges and innovations that defined this era in the company’s history.
3. Miniature range
The “Miniature range” intrinsically tied to “games workshop 89-79” represents a specific cohort of products characterized by distinct design aesthetics, faction affiliations, and intended gameplay applications. This range reflects not only the physical miniatures themselves but also the associated narratives and lore that informed their creation. The numerical identifier marks the period during which these miniatures were actively produced and marketed, thus influencing availability and collectability. A key factor is the evolution of sculpting techniques; miniatures from this era showcase characteristics unique to the available technology and artistic styles of the time. This affects details, posing, and even the scale consistency within the range itself. For instance, early Warhammer 40,000 miniatures released within the “games workshop 89-79” timeframe exhibit a markedly different aesthetic compared to later iterations, often characterized by blockier forms and simpler detailing. This difference is directly attributable to the production capabilities and artistic trends prevalent at the time.
Further analysis of the “Miniature range” reveals the strategic decisions behind their design and introduction. The release of specific units or characters often coincided with major rulebook updates or campaign expansions. This deliberate synchronization served to enhance the gameplay experience and incentivize purchases of both miniatures and supplementary materials. Additionally, the “Miniature range” from “games workshop 89-79” provides a valuable case study in the evolution of specific factions or armies within the Games Workshop universes. Analyzing the types of units that were introduced, and the roles they were designed to fulfill, offers insights into the prevailing meta-game and the narrative themes that were being emphasized. The “Miniature range” also dictates the secondary market value, as items produced during “games workshop 89-79” and no longer in production command higher prices. The “Miniature range” provides essential details of the product and lore. The product range, lore, and miniature designs all are connected by the game rules.
In conclusion, understanding the “Miniature range” associated with “games workshop 89-79” is crucial for cataloging, collecting, and appreciating the historical significance of Games Workshop products. It provides context for design choices, market strategies, and the evolution of the company’s intellectual properties. Challenges in accurately identifying and categorizing miniatures from this period stem from the lack of standardized naming conventions and the potential for variations in production quality. However, a careful examination of catalog references, visual characteristics, and associated publications enables a more complete understanding of the era and its contribution to the broader hobby.
4. Rule set version
The “Rule set version” prevalent during “games workshop 89-79” forms an integral component of understanding the products and strategies associated with that period. The specific rules in use directly influenced miniature design, gameplay mechanics, and the overall tactical considerations within the Games Workshop universe. This version dictated army composition, unit statistics, and the resolution of conflicts, thereby shaping the player experience. For example, if a specific edition of Warhammer 40,000 was in effect during “games workshop 89-79”, the miniature range would reflect the unit types and weaponry permissible under those rules. Moreover, strategic emphasis within the game, such as close combat versus ranged warfare, was determined by the prevailing rule set, impacting player preferences and the perceived effectiveness of different army factions.
Analyzing the “Rule set version” within the context of “games workshop 89-79” reveals the design philosophies that guided the game’s development. Certain rule sets prioritized realism and complexity, resulting in intricate combat systems and extensive unit customization options. Other versions favored streamlined gameplay and accessibility, leading to simpler rules and faster-paced battles. Consequently, the characteristics of miniatures released during this period were often optimized for use within the specific framework established by the “Rule set version.” The game’s balance heavily influenced the units produced in the “Miniature range,” allowing gamers to use miniatures that were effective for their armies. If a new product became dominant in game, the game rule was often updated to balance the play.
In summary, the “Rule set version” is a critical factor for interpreting the “games workshop 89-79” timeframe. It provides context for miniature design, gameplay strategies, and the overall aesthetic of the Games Workshop universe during that period. Challenges in accurately identifying the specific “Rule set version” stem from potential inconsistencies in publications and the presence of unofficial modifications. However, careful examination of rulebooks, White Dwarf magazine articles, and contemporaneous product releases enables a comprehensive understanding of the rules in effect and their impact on the broader hobby.
5. Aesthetic trends
The “Aesthetic trends” prevalent during “games workshop 89-79” are essential in understanding the visual character of Games Workshop’s products and marketing materials from that era. These trends encompass a range of elements, from the sculpting style of miniatures to the color palettes used in illustrations and packaging, reflecting the broader cultural and artistic influences of the time.
-
Sculpting Style and Proportions
The sculpting style of miniatures within “games workshop 89-79” often mirrored broader trends in fantasy and science fiction art. Proportions might have leaned towards heroic scales with exaggerated features, or alternatively, towards more realistic anatomical representations. The level of detail, texture, and overall dynamism in poses all reflect the prevailing sculpting techniques and artistic preferences. These characteristics influence the visual impact of the miniatures and their compatibility with later releases.
-
Color Palettes and Painting Techniques
The color palettes used in painted miniatures, box art, and other promotional materials were indicative of the aesthetic trends of the period. The selection of colors, application techniques (e.g., drybrushing, highlighting), and overall painting style contributed to a distinct visual identity. Examining these elements reveals insights into the intended mood and atmosphere of the Games Workshop universes during “games workshop 89-79.” The style of painting and the color options often affected the public’s perception of the product.
-
Illustration Style and Graphic Design
The illustration style employed on rulebooks, codices, and other publications further defined the aesthetic landscape. The choice of artists, the level of detail in illustrations, and the overall composition of images all contributed to the visual narrative. The graphic design elements, such as font choices, layout, and use of borders, also played a significant role in creating a cohesive aesthetic. The illustrations of the products affected their marketing and public perception.
-
Thematic Influences and Cultural Context
The thematic influences evident in the “games workshop 89-79” aesthetic reflected broader cultural trends in fantasy, science fiction, and historical fiction. The incorporation of specific visual motifs, historical references, and cultural archetypes shaped the overall tone and feel of the Games Workshop universes. Understanding these influences provides context for the design choices and narrative themes that were prevalent during this period. The design choices affected the products popularity and cultural perceptions.
In summary, the “Aesthetic trends” associated with “games workshop 89-79” are critical for understanding the visual identity and cultural context of Games Workshop’s products during that era. These trends shaped the sculpting style, color palettes, illustration techniques, and thematic influences that defined the visual landscape of the company’s universes. Recognizing these aesthetic characteristics allows for a more nuanced appreciation of the historical significance and artistic merit of Games Workshop’s products from this period. A study of the aesthetic trends in the products help to understand the product’s history.
6. Marketing approach
The marketing approach employed by Games Workshop during “games workshop 89-79” significantly influenced the perception and adoption of its products. This period’s marketing strategies, which included print advertising in hobbyist magazines, direct mail catalogues, and participation in conventions, aimed to cultivate a dedicated customer base and expand market reach. The content of these campaigns emphasized the collectability of miniatures, the immersive nature of the gaming experience, and the opportunity for creative expression through painting and customization. For example, advertisements frequently showcased intricately painted miniatures alongside detailed battle scenarios, highlighting both the artistic and strategic dimensions of the hobby. The marketing during “games workshop 89-79” resulted in an increased awareness of the products.
Furthermore, the marketing of “games workshop 89-79” emphasized the narrative and lore associated with its intellectual properties. Promotional materials often featured excerpts from in-universe fiction, character profiles, and historical accounts, enriching the gaming experience and fostering a sense of immersion. This approach not only promoted individual products but also contributed to the development of a larger, interconnected narrative universe that resonated with consumers. The marketing was based on an ever growing world of gaming, providing new products in the form of minatures.
In summary, the marketing approach of Games Workshop during “games workshop 89-79” was instrumental in shaping its brand identity and fostering a dedicated community. Challenges in evaluating the long-term effectiveness of these strategies stem from the limitations of available data and the evolving nature of consumer preferences. However, the marketing was responsible for attracting consumers to the games. Understanding the strategies employed provides valuable insights into the company’s historical success and its ongoing relevance in the miniatures wargaming hobby. The marketings campaigns help connect products to game rules and miniature product ranges.
7. Collectibility value
The “Collectibility value” assigned to items produced during the “games workshop 89-79” period is a significant factor influencing their market price and desirability among hobbyists. This value is determined by a confluence of factors, each contributing to the perceived rarity, historical importance, and overall appeal of these items.
-
Rarity and Production Volume
The number of units initially produced during “games workshop 89-79” directly affects collectibility. Limited production runs, miscasts, or variations in packaging increase an item’s scarcity, driving up its value. A miniature only available for a short time during this period, for example, becomes more sought after than a mass-produced item. The scarcity also relates to how the game rules value a minature product.
-
Historical Significance and Nostalgia
Items from “games workshop 89-79” represent a specific era in the company’s history. Their association with pivotal rule set editions, iconic characters, or significant events in the lore contributes to their historical importance. Nostalgia among long-time hobbyists further enhances the appeal and collectibility of these items, making them representative relics of a bygone era in the hobby’s evolution. As game rules evolved, so has the collectibility of those game pieces. Also, the product aesthetic is related to nostaglia of that era.
-
Condition and Completeness
The physical state of an item dramatically affects its collectibility value. Miniatures in mint condition, unpainted and still in their original packaging, command a premium price. Completeness also matters, particularly for boxed sets or promotional items where all components must be present to maximize value. For example, a fully intact boxed game from “games workshop 89-79”, with all miniatures, rulebooks, and accessories included, is far more desirable to collectors than an incomplete or damaged set. The pristine physical and packaging helps show how the game was perceived during that era.
-
Demand and Market Trends
Current market trends and the overall demand for specific product lines within “games workshop 89-79” influence collectibility. A resurgence in popularity of a particular faction or game system can lead to a surge in demand for miniatures and related items from that period. Auction prices, online marketplaces, and collector forums provide valuable insights into these market dynamics, reflecting the fluctuating values and desirability of items from this era. As marketing trends change, this often leads to an increased interest in a specific product, faction, or unit.
In conclusion, the “Collectibility value” associated with “games workshop 89-79” items is a multifaceted concept, driven by rarity, historical significance, condition, and market demand. These factors interrelate, creating a complex ecosystem that shapes the market for vintage Games Workshop products and highlights their enduring appeal to collectors and hobbyists. Market demand of a game product, aesthetic trend, and nostalgic feeling helps to keep the collectibility strong.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the period designated by “games workshop 89-79,” offering clarification and detailed insights.
Question 1: What specific period does “games workshop 89-79” represent?
The identifier “games workshop 89-79” typically refers to a specific year range (1979-1989) or catalogue number encompassing products and activities of Games Workshop during that era. The exact application depends on context, but generally denotes items or events originating within this timeframe.
Question 2: What types of products were commonly released during “games workshop 89-79”?
Product releases during this period included metal and plastic miniatures, rulebooks for various wargames (such as Warhammer Fantasy Battle and early editions of Warhammer 40,000), board games, and hobby-related accessories like paints and glues. Catalogues also featured prominently, showcasing available items and promoting the hobby.
Question 3: How did the aesthetic of miniatures during “games workshop 89-79” differ from later periods?
Miniatures from this era often exhibit distinct sculpting styles, reflecting the technologies and artistic preferences of the time. Proportions, detailing, and posing may differ significantly from modern miniatures, potentially impacting their visual compatibility and collectibility.
Question 4: What rule set editions were prevalent during “games workshop 89-79”?
The prevailing rule set editions depended on the specific game system. For Warhammer Fantasy Battle, this period encompassed early editions of the game. For Warhammer 40,000, “games workshop 89-79” corresponds to the Rogue Trader era and its immediate aftermath. Determining the exact rule set is crucial for understanding gameplay mechanics and unit capabilities.
Question 5: What factors influence the collectibility value of items from “games workshop 89-79”?
Several factors contribute to collectibility value, including rarity, condition, completeness, historical significance, and current market demand. Items in mint condition, with original packaging and all associated components, typically command higher prices among collectors.
Question 6: Where can information about Games Workshop products from “games workshop 89-79” be found?
Information can be found in vintage Games Workshop catalogues, White Dwarf magazines from the period, online collector forums, and auction sites. These resources provide details about product releases, painting guides, and historical context.
In summary, understanding “games workshop 89-79” requires consideration of several interconnected factors, including product types, aesthetic trends, rule set editions, and market dynamics. This information provides a foundation for further exploration of Games Workshop’s history.
The next section will explore specific examples of miniatures and games released during this timeframe.
Tips Based on the “Games Workshop 89-79” Era
The era designated by “games workshop 89-79” offers valuable lessons relevant to modern collectors and hobbyists. Examining products and practices from this period provides insights into preservation, restoration, and informed purchasing decisions.
Tip 1: Research Product History. Thoroughly investigate the production timeframe and specific characteristics of miniatures from “games workshop 89-79.” This aids in identifying genuine articles and assessing their originality.
Tip 2: Handle Metal Miniatures With Care. Metal miniatures from this period are prone to corrosion. Store them in a dry environment and avoid prolonged contact with skin. Regular inspection is recommended to detect and address any signs of degradation.
Tip 3: Preserve Original Packaging When Possible. Original packaging significantly enhances the collectibility value of items from “games workshop 89-79.” Store boxed sets and blister packs in protective sleeves to prevent damage from handling and environmental factors.
Tip 4: Consult Vintage Catalogues and Publications. Accessing vintage Games Workshop catalogues and White Dwarf magazines from this period provides essential information about painting schemes, assembly instructions, and historical context. These resources are invaluable for accurate restoration and display.
Tip 5: Exercise Caution When Restoring Miniatures. When restoring miniatures from “games workshop 89-79”, prioritize non-invasive techniques. Avoid harsh chemicals that may damage the original paint or plastic. Gentle cleaning with mild soap and water is often sufficient.
Tip 6: Be Aware of Counterfeit Items. The demand for vintage Games Workshop products can lead to the proliferation of counterfeit items. Compare miniatures to known examples in reputable catalogues or online databases to verify authenticity.
Tip 7: Document Provenance. If possible, gather information about the item’s ownership history. Provenance documentation enhances the perceived value and legitimacy of collectibles from “games workshop 89-79”.
Understanding the context surrounding the “games workshop 89-79” period empowers informed decisions, leading to enhanced preservation and appreciation of historical Games Workshop products.
These tips prepare for informed exploration of miniature painting during this timeframe.
Conclusion
The examination of “games workshop 89-79” has provided a comprehensive overview of a pivotal era within the history of Games Workshop. Key aspects explored include the product ranges available, the aesthetic trends prevalent, the rule set editions in use, and the marketing strategies employed. Furthermore, the considerations influencing the collectibility value of items from this period have been addressed, alongside practical tips for preservation and restoration. This analysis reinforces the importance of understanding the historical context when engaging with vintage Games Workshop products.
The enduring legacy of “games workshop 89-79” lies in its contribution to the foundation of the modern miniatures wargaming hobby. The products and practices established during this timeframe continue to influence collectors, gamers, and enthusiasts. Continued research and preservation efforts are essential to ensure that the lessons and legacy of this era are not forgotten, and serve as a guide for future generations within the hobby.
